Bug#1092912: quickjs: somewhat dead upstream, switch to quickjs-ng ?

[Sebastian Humenda]

Hi

Jérémy Lal schrieb am 17.01.2025, 12:23 +0100:
>Le jeu. 16 janv. 2025 à 19:20, Sebastian Humenda <shumenda at gmx.de> a écrit :
>
>> I recall that upstream of Edbrowse wasn't so intrested in switching to
>> quickjs-ng. For me, it's mostly a matter of actually trying edbrowse with
>> quickjs-ng, as quickjs was packed *because of* edbrowse. I do lack the time
>> ATM, so if you'd be willing to take a look whether this works, I'd
>> appreciate
>
>I've pushed a Draft PR to edbrowse.

I'll take a look.

>I propose to maintain quickjs. I'm going to use it with nginx's njs.
>It makes sense to me to change its team maintenance to
>pkg-javascript-devel, or even simply to debian group.

I'd like to stay uploader. I'd follow your suggestion, pkg-javascript sounds
reasonable, but I won't be able to follow the team's development along.
What steps are required from my side?

Cheers
Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-a11y-devel/attachments/20250117/db60681d/attachment.sig>