[pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#648565: New upstream release

[Bartosz Cisek]

W dniu 15.12.2011 22:42, Luca Capello pisze:
> NB, your reply should have been a follow-up to [1] and to the Debian
>     BTS: I replied on purpose to all the people who asked for an updated
>     version to document the status on the BTS (which is supposed to stay
>     "forever", not like this mailing list).

I just wanted to ask question and wasn't sure if cluttering BTS was a
good idea.

>> I'm also interested in building packages of Bacula 5.2.x. Recently Luca
>> Capello said [1] that there is updated repo [2] that provides 5.2.1
>> version. debian/control file is quite old so I'm not sure if this repo
>> is correct one or I miss something.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/2011-December/000113.html
>> [2] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-bacula/pkg-bacula.git;a=summary
> 
> What does it mean that the Git debian/control is quite old?  Have you
> checked it against the last package available in Debian, to find out
> where is the problem?

> Indeed, the Git repository at [2] is missing the last uploaded Debian
> version: Hauke, I guess you forgot a `git pull`, can you do it, please?

This is what I meant 'old debian/control' :) I looked for some
development branch with you improved build procedure. I really look
forward for it. I tried to fix it by myself (build all DB drivers at one
time) but stuck in shlibs packaging.

> BTW, the Git repository should be 'bacula.git' and not 'pkg-bacula.git',
>      given that it has never been included in any official Debian
>      package yet I will fix it in the next days.

Great :)
-- 
Bartosz Cisek
Admin

email: bartosz.cisek at nasza-klasa.pl
tel: +48 519 300 122

Nasza Klasa Sp. z o.o.,
ul. Gen. J. Bema 2, 50-265 Wrocław

Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu,
VI Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego,
nr KRS:0000289629, NIP:898-21-22-104 REGON:020586020,
Kapitał zakładowy: 67 850,00 PLN