[pkg-bacula-devel] Request to sponsor 5.2.6+dfsg-2 to backports

[Bart Swedrowski]

On 3 August 2012 16:18, Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> wrote:
>> Let me know should I change anything else.
>
> debdiff shows the differences below, mostly in package size: how
> have you compiled them?  I used the following line from the Git's
> squeeze-backports branch and tried twice, with the same debdiff output:
> =====
> luca at gismo:~/src/Debian/pkg-bacula/bacula(git)[squeeze-backports]
> $ DIST=base-squeeze git buildpackage
> =====
>
> Given that there should be no differences (if we start from the same
> building chroot, which should be the case), I would like to understand
> what is happening before uploading the binaries you built.

Ok this one is weird.

I used following command to build it: DIST=squeeze ARCH=amd64
git-buildpackage --git-debian-branch=squeeze-backports
-v5.2.6+dfsg-2~bpo60+1 with following ~/.gbp.conf:

$ cat /home/bart/.gbp.conf
[DEFAULT]
builder = git-pbuilder
cleaner = fakeroot debian/rules clean
pristine-tar = True

[git-buildpackage]
sign-tags = True
keyid = 0xD9D80961
export-dir = ../build-area/
tarball-dir = ../tarballs/

Not really sure where those changes are coming from - I just rebuild
it again and there're no differences.  Can you upload somewhere what
you got?

> Finally, always because I am a maniac, here some more remarks…

Thanks for those - points taken :-)