[pkg-bacula-devel] Request to sponsor 5.2.6+dfsg-2 to backports

[Luca Capello]

Hi Bart!

On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:39:28 +0200, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
> On 3 August 2012 16:18, Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> wrote:
>>> Let me know should I change anything else.
>>
>> debdiff shows the differences below, mostly in package size: how
>> have you compiled them?  I used the following line from the Git's
>> squeeze-backports branch and tried twice, with the same debdiff output:
>> =====
>> luca at gismo:~/src/Debian/pkg-bacula/bacula(git)[squeeze-backports]
>> $ DIST=base-squeeze git buildpackage
>> =====
>>
>> Given that there should be no differences (if we start from the same
>> building chroot, which should be the case), I would like to understand
>> what is happening before uploading the binaries you built.
>
> Ok this one is weird.
>
> I used following command to build it: DIST=squeeze ARCH=amd64
> git-buildpackage --git-debian-branch=squeeze-backports
> -v5.2.6+dfsg-2~bpo60+1 with following ~/.gbp.conf:

ARCH should be useless (what is in DIST will be used), as well as
--git-debian-branch because of debian/gbp.conf.  And IIRC even -v should
be useless, given that this is not the first upload to backports,

> $ cat /home/bart/.gbp.conf
> [DEFAULT]
> builder = git-pbuilder
> cleaner = fakeroot debian/rules clean
> pristine-tar = True

My differences, available at <http://people.debian.org/~gismo/debian/>:

  builder = gismo-pdebuild.sh
  # workawround for bug #480075
  cleaner = /bin/true

> Not really sure where those changes are coming from - I just rebuild
> it again and there're no differences.  Can you upload somewhere what
> you got?

Sure: <http://people.debian.org/~gismo/tmp/GISMO_second/>.

Just to be clear: I have no clue why things are different :-(

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20120808/0548117e/attachment.pgp>