[pkg-bacula-devel] [pkg-bacula-commits] [SCM] Bacula, a network backup, recovery and verification program branch, master, updated. debian/5.0.3-1-121-g2b82cc6
alexandro at ankalagon.ru
Sat Jun 2 13:24:33 UTC 2012
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 14:34:36 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi Alexander!
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:55:40 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:35:41 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:31:20 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
>>>> Upstream patch is incorrect.
>>>> They add 'libtool/ltdl.m4' usage into aclocal.m4, but forget add
>>> I discovered that while testing the upstream patch: given that
>>> suggested that we need to regenerate aclocal.m4 anyway, I guessed
>>> this was correct and this is why I added libltdl-dev to
>>> Thus, if I have understood correctly, if we add 'libtool/ltdl.m4'
>>> there is no more need for libltdl-dev.
>> Hmm, if i understand Marco post in upstream bugtracker, we need
>> regenerate only configure script, not aclocal.m4
> According to Marco's comment (i.e. "B.T.W. Don't forget to recompile
> your configure see Makefile on how to do that."), the only
> information I
> found where in Makefile.in:67:
> # Note, the following is needed in the above if ever any new
> macro is added.
> # However, at the current time, the -I libtool causes the
> # get messed up, so this is commented out
> # cd autoconf && aclocal -I bacula-macros -I gettext-macros
> -I libtool
Yes, Marco post is not clean. Maybe there was instruction about
autoconf in the past, but not now.
>> in upstream bug 1880 Marco write, that he add missed file, but it
>> push his changes, so i can't get his version.
> Three patches landed in upstream Git:
> * commit:ddd5c96759c994dee2c8b0d20dff38b7e7853148
> Fix bug #1870 GNU binutils-gold build failure.
> Use some extra libtool magic to determine what lib to use
> to get dlopen and friends for loading plugins from libbac.
> => (Debian) commit:2b82cc6db4bf9323593c156eea0163c718ff6096
> debian/patches/fix-binutils-gold-linking.patch: from upstream
> * commit:a68bb6eb2de06c96507ffd1eeeee032a77112cf5
> Tweak recompile configure.in
> => this patch actually does not touch autoconf/configure.in, but
> configure: given that we anyway call autoconf (because of the
> MySQL-5.5 patch
> should we need this?
> * commit:e72fe7a6a2b65b907f5a89f77117ffa28404a95a
> Fix bug #1880 ltdl.m4 missing for new feature.
> => (Debian) commit:440819e8f46c19c335d2e1632baf3bd8905ce163
> fix aclocal.m4 regeneration
> However, what about the following patch, is it necessary?
> * commit:8f60b57e48ce343086d652e093e8e64ec7494283
> Tweak rebuild config.h.in
No, we don't need this patch.
There is only commit, where Marco call autoconf fot regenerate
>> Yes, it look like we can remove this build depends.
> Done (tested building with or without binutils-gold):
> Testing packages are available at:
> Thx, bye,
> Gismo / Luca
with best regards,
email: alexandro at ankalagon.ru
xmpp: alexandro at ankalagon.ru
More information about the pkg-bacula-devel