[pkg-bacula-devel] Bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-5_bpo60+1 review & upload request

[Luca Capello]

Hi there!

On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:24:06 +0200, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
> On 30 September 2012 12:43, Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> wrote:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>  bacula-common : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but
>> 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed
>>  bacula-fd : Depends: initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) but
>> 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1 is to be installed
>> E: Broken packages
>> mantissa:~#
>
> Whoops - pretty embarrassing.  I fixed that in 5.2.6+dfsg-5~bpo60+2
> (i.e reverted it back to use /var/run).  Please see
> http://sultan.timedout.org/~bart/debian/barts-squeeze-backports/ again
[...]
> Let me know should you spot anything else.  But I reckon it should be
> good to go now.

Now everything is fine, but as I previously wrote:

  <http://lists.debian.org/87391zivmj.fsf@gismo.pca.it>

  On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:30:22 +0200, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
  > I'd like to ask for a review and upload of Bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-5_bpo60+1 packages.

  Backports are permitted only for the same version which is in testing,
  i.e. 5.2.6+dfsg-2, so we need to wait until 5.2.6+dfsg-5 enters that
  distribution.

5.2.6+dfsg-5 has not yet migrated to wheezy, (sort of) too young and
also because there is a serious bug WRT to policy (#688199) reported
against 5.2.6+dfsg-3 and still present in 5.2.6+dfsg-5.

I agree with Alexandro's solution, but as you noticed I do not have a
lot of free time lately, so I am not sure I can fix it in the next days.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20121002/2354aced/attachment.pgp>