[pkg-bacula-devel] [bacula] 02/04: Move bscan into it's own package, making bacula-sd-DBTYPE obsolete

Sven Hartge sven at svenhartge.de
Thu Jul 28 14:50:04 UTC 2016

On 26.07.2016 11:01, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:

>> But now we may run into a problem if the director is restarted before
>> bacula-director-DBTYPE is configured correctly. For example we may miss
>> the needed DB updates or the new libbaccats.so is not yet unpacked.
> I think it should just work. From the policy:
> "The Depends field should also be used if the postinst or prerm scripts
> require the depended-on package to be unpacked or configured in order to
> run."
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps
> But that's one reason why I'd like to do extensive tests before I upload
> anything from this branch.

I tested the latest packages from branch migrate-files and everything
looks fine so far. The init-scripts and systemd-files are added
correctly and the needed prerm/postinst modifications by debhelper are
also correct. Because it now just works, I went ahead and removed the
commented lines from debian/rules and also fixed the changelog to not
contain false or misleading information.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20160728/1c222f18/attachment.sig>

More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list