[pkg-bacula-devel] Building with debhelper 10

Sven Hartge sven at svenhartge.de
Wed Sep 14 21:24:45 UTC 2016

On 14.09.2016 22:06, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
>> I just did a test build with debian/compat=10 to test the new debhelper
>> version 10.
> [...]
>> In summary both variants of the packages are functionally the same, the
>> dh_installinit change (which is OK) and the maintscript change (which is
>> also OK) being the only differences. All other changes in sizes and
>> checksums are a result of the other changes.
> so in short, it doesn't matter for us if we build with compat 9 or 10,
> and we can bump it up for builds targeted to unstable.

The backportability would be a bit lesser that way, because debhelper in
Jessie only knows level 9.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20160914/5c338dcf/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list