[pkg-bacula-devel] git push for 9.0.5 ready

[Sven Hartge]

On 05.11.2017 23:52, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
>>> I installed 7.4.4 and then copied bacula.db from /var/lib/bacula to use
>>> sqldiff after upgrading to 9.0.0.
>>
>> And here is the diff between the two databases, before and after the
>> upgrade.
> 
>> More interesting is the difference between an upgraded DB and a native
>> fresh installed DB.
> 
> I didn't know about sqldiff, I did something like that by "hand" (see
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2316)
> 
>> The schema of the Pool table (hehe) is different.
> 
> That's where the CacheRetention was missing, but we should have fixed
> that?

Hmm. When I look at the databases directly I don't have
Pool.CacheRetention in my upgraded-9.0.5 database. But it should have
been there, if the correct upgrade script was used. It is in the 9.0.0
upgrade script for dbconfig in my 9.0.5 packages.

I am attaching my databases for you to compare. I am not sure anymore
what I am seeing and what not.

S°


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bacula-dbs.tar.xz
Type: application/x-xz
Size: 5652 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20171106/a4d0e4cb/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20171106/a4d0e4cb/attachment.sig>