[pkg-bacula-devel] SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid

Carsten Leonhardt leo at debian.org
Thu Nov 9 23:57:33 UTC 2017

Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de> writes:

> The apparent intent, as evidenced by the copyright statement in the
> source code parts of RFC 6234, is that the code parts are available
> under that licensing option, even though they are not otherwise marked
> as code components under the TLP.

So in essence the code is ok to use now and we don't need to remove it
anymore? Or is "the apparent intent" not enough for that?



More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list