[pkg-bacula-devel] SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri Nov 10 08:02:53 UTC 2017

* Carsten Leonhardt:

> Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de> writes:
>> The apparent intent, as evidenced by the copyright statement in the
>> source code parts of RFC 6234, is that the code parts are available
>> under that licensing option, even though they are not otherwise marked
>> as code components under the TLP.
> So in essence the code is ok to use now and we don't need to remove it
> anymore? Or is "the apparent intent" not enough for that?

I have not checked whether the code in the new RFC is the same as in
the old RFC.

More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list