[pkg-bacula-devel] Fixing lintian tag executable-in-usr-lib?

[Sven Hartge]

On 11.05.20 09:07, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
> 
>> These json tools do not seem to be internal because Bacula components
>> don't use them. And they can be used by shell scripts and by
>> administrator.
>>
>> I am wondering why not use /usr/sbin path to store them:
> 
> I think I chose the /usr/lib location because btraceback was already
> there. Upstream installs them in /usr/sbin by default, OpenBSD in
> /usr/local/sbin.
> 
> I don't see why we couldn't move them to /usr/sbin, especially if it
> makes your life easier.

I agree. I only moved them to /usr/libexec because they where in
/usr/lib, without further questioning if they should be in /usr/lib in
the first place.

I will prepare the needed changes.

Grüße,
Sven.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20200511/0aa14576/attachment.sig>