Bug#511521: boinc: Does not check the RSA_public_decrypt() return value.

[Frank S. Thomas]

On Sunday 11 January 2009 22:54:46 Steffen Moeller wrote:
> int () functions that always return 0 are always suspicious unless they are
> also named zero :)  This is a clear issue for upstream to address IMHO.
> Frank, what was your latest channel to contact upstream?

I contacted upstream either by using the boinc_dev[1] mailing list or by 
submitting a new ticket (aka reporting a new bug :-)[2].

[1] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
[2] http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/newticket

Cheers
Frank
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boinc-devel/attachments/20090112/e4d40a68/attachment.pgp