Bug#511521: boinc: Does not check the RSA_public_decrypt() return value.

Frank S. Thomas fst at debian.org
Mon Jan 12 13:29:57 UTC 2009


On Monday 12 January 2009 10:37:32 Frank S. Thomas wrote:
> On Sunday 11 January 2009 22:54:46 Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > int () functions that always return 0 are always suspicious unless they
> > are also named zero :)  This is a clear issue for upstream to address
> > IMHO. Frank, what was your latest channel to contact upstream?
>
> I contacted upstream either by using the boinc_dev[1] mailing list or by
> submitting a new ticket (aka reporting a new bug :-)[2].

FTR: Milos Jakubicek, the Fedora BOINC maintainer, has already forwarded this 
bug upstream: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/ticket/823
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boinc-devel/attachments/20090112/cb0bba7f/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-boinc-devel mailing list