About the patches in src:boinc

Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfranco at yahoo.it
Tue May 27 07:50:53 UTC 2014


Wonderful! thanks Guo for your nice cleanup!


In my opinion we should keep the delta from upstream as minimal as possible, and when your cleanup will be finisched I'll try to make a good patch for having a dynamic linkage, and try to push it upstream

something like "--enable-dynamic-libraries" that will remove for us also the dynamic link patches.

Upstream doesn't want to link it dinamically, but a switch should be good for everybody.

thoughts?



Gianfranco




Il Martedì 27 Maggio 2014 4:18, Guo Yixuan <culu.gyx at gmail.com> ha scritto:
 

>
>
>On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Guo Yixuan <culu.gyx at gmail.com> wrote:
>> @Steffen
>> Would you mind if I removed your const patch set?
>>
>> I mean these ones:
>>
>> debian/patches/series:
>> 13:#AddSomeConstToMakeClearMemoryIsNotAllocated.patch
>> 14:#AddingMoreConst.patch
>> 15:#evenMoreConst03.patch
>>
>> and also annoying_warning_const_image.patch (not in series)
>
>
>also:
>andYetMorePatches04.patch
>
>> They seem to be just for debugging purpose, and it's not quite
>> meanful to maintain them in Debian. (It would be nice if the
>> upstream takes them, but we should not add them to our
>> maintenance burden, or to upstream-Debian deviation,
>> should we?)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Yixuan
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boinc-devel/attachments/20140527/57d80050/attachment.html>


More information about the pkg-boinc-devel mailing list