please don't fork javahelper
Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza
eugeniocanom at gmail.com
Sun Jun 9 18:56:54 UTC 2013
Thank you for the welcome message and your wishes for this project. I hope
this contribution can be of great benefit to the Debian and non-Debian
community. I also want to salute the java packaging team and hope we get to
As Paul mentioned earlier, we've talked about this and there will be no
forking. I apologize for not updating the project description (that's done
now). My wish is to reuse javahelper as much as possible and build on top
of it. I hope we can work together on building and improving these tools.
I'm eugecm on #debian-clojure if you need to contact me, I'm there 24/7 and
you can also contact me via email.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Wolodja Wentland <debian at babilen5.org>wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 13:03 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > > So your plan to fork javahelper and to create just another packaging
> > > terrified me. Are you really sure that you need to fork javahelper and
> that you
> > > can not extend javahelper for your needs?
> > Terrified is a bit strong.
> > There won't be code copies if we can prevent it (it'd have to be really
> > unexpected at this point) and extend / wrap the existing tool where we
> I agree wholeheartedly with this. It might make sense to clarify this in
> GSoC project description lest other people also be misled.
> Wolodja <debian at babilen5.org>
> 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
> Pkg-clojure-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-clojure-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pkg-clojure-maintainers