please don't fork javahelper

[Wolodja Wentland]

On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 13:03 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:

> > So your plan to fork javahelper and to create just another packaging tool 
> > terrified me. Are you really sure that you need to fork javahelper and that you 
> > can not extend javahelper for your needs?
> 
> Terrified is a bit strong.
> 
> There won't be code copies if we can prevent it (it'd have to be really
> unexpected at this point) and extend / wrap the existing tool where we can't.

I agree wholeheartedly with this. It might make sense to clarify this in the
GSoC project description lest other people also be misled.
-- 
Wolodja <debian at babilen5.org>

4096R/CAF14EFC
081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clojure-maintainers/attachments/20130609/84980b9d/attachment.pgp>