Very quick questions about ln_makepkg

[Wolodja Wentland]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 22:35 +0200, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I managed to make a Debian package for ln_makepkg. While I was using it to
> package scout a few things came to my mind:
> 
>     * If source name is "scout-clojure", what is the correct filename for the
>     generated jar? is it scout.jar or scout-clojure.jar?

Whatever is used by upstream which is most likely "scout.jar".

>     * Is it an overkill to automatically look for the ITP bug the package
>     closes?

I wouldn't mind to have this functionality if it doesn't cause the codebase to
become harder to maintain or more complicated. Please also make sure that it
is still possible to use the tools offline without problems.

>     * Should I package ln_makepkg by itself for now or should it be part of
>     leinhelper (or some other name) and we just add tools to the package while
>     they come?

I would prefer the latter -- We have to think about circular dependencies on
leiningen though if we want to use *some* of the tools to package leiningen's
own dependencies.
-- 
Wolodja <debian at babilen5.org>

4096R/CAF14EFC
081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clojure-maintainers/attachments/20130612/cbf7ce3a/attachment.sig>