[Pkg-dpdk-devel] not-so-multiarch

Luca Boccassi luca.boccassi at gmail.com
Wed Jul 5 08:59:34 UTC 2017

On July 5, 2017 9:52:11 AM GMT+01:00, Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>with the latest one I was able to build against the proposed changes in
>dpdk [1].
>Also I was able to "still" build against the former dpdk [2].
>Also if there is no pkg-config for libdpdk then all should be as it was
>I think I need to suggest that upstream to openvswitch (I'll set Luca
>Once accepted there I can backport that onto our openvswitch.
>Then finally we can accept and upload into 16.11.x packaging.
>Ok with that approach?

Thanks for taking it forward!

The approach is definitely fine.

Just a note regarding the libs: if DPDK_LIBS is not used, how does it get the list of libraries to link to?

Check if there's a LIBS variable, might be a better one to append to rather than LDFLAGS (it's also correct, the latter is for linker flags, not for libs).

Regarding fetching variables from pkgconfig it can be done in autoconf, I'll find how and forward it.

Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 512 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-dpdk-devel/attachments/20170705/b5aa04cc/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the Pkg-dpdk-devel mailing list