[Pkg-electronics-devel] Remaining issues for geda-gaf
أحمد المحمودي
aelmahmoudy at users.sourceforge.net
Thu Nov 26 04:47:30 UTC 2009
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:24:33AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Peter makes a good point - there is no use for a libgeda-dev package at
> all. We could consider this later if you want to keep it for now.
Shouldn't every library package have a devel package with it ? Just in
case that some developer would need it maybe ?
> Similarly, libgedaXX.so.* could move into libgeda-common... but we would
> need to discuss this on debian-devel first I think because it would be
> a policy violation. Or perhaps not if it was in /usr/lib/<something>
> rather than directly in /usr/lib, but then we'd need to use RPATH..
> argh.
libgedaXX.so.* is a binary file (actually a binary & a symlink to it),
so it can't be in the Arch: all libgeda-common.
Btw, there is one remaining issue in the package: although I do:
dh_makeshlibs -a -V'$(LIBPKG) (= $(DEBIAN_VERSION))
Yet the resulting binaries have this dependancy: libgeda38 (>= 1.6.0)
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
More information about the Pkg-electronics-devel
mailing list