[Pkg-electronics-devel] RFS: systemc/2.3.2-1 [NEW]

أحمد المحمودي aelmahmoudy at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Jul 9 14:06:42 BST 2018


On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 09:30:46PM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> 
> I had a quick view on it. First issue (in my eyes) I've seen was a
> missing tag of the imported version on the upstream branch so I'd need
> to use pristine-tar manually to create the orig tarball.
> git-buildpackage does the creation of the orig tarball automatically if
> it found a tag based on the entry in the changelog file so I created the
> tag by myself.
 
I forgot to push that tag. Just pushed it now.
> 
> > E: systemc source: missing-notice-file-for-apache-license NOTICE

Hmmm, I don't get this error here ! I am running lintian 2.6.92

> > I: libsystemc-doc: spelling-error-in-copyright Synopsys Synopsis
> > I: libsystemc: spelling-error-in-copyright Synopsys Synopsis
> > I: libsystemc-dev: spelling-error-in-copyright Synopsys Synopsis

False positives, Synopsis is a company name well known in EDA field.
I shall add overrides

> > W: libsystemc: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libsystemc-2.3.2

We discussed this earlier.

> > I: systemc source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing
> > I: libsystemc-doc: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
> > I: libsystemc: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsystemc-2.3.2.so modfied modified
> > I: libsystemc: hardening-no-bindnow usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsystemc-2.3.2.so
> > I: libsystemc-dev: extra-license-file usr/include/sysc/packages/boost/config/platform/bsd.hpp
> 
> Also the doc-base issue can be solved by adding a sequencer file.

I'll look at this again.

> The last entry on the list is obviously a false positive that can get a
> override, but looking at the file in detail you probably have missed
> it's licensed under boost-1.0 like all other files in the folder too.
> This will result by a rejected of the ftpmaster for the complete package
> as the information in the copyright file is not complete.
> 
> I guess all the files and folders aren't really needed and could be
> simply dropped while importing the source, if so you would need to add a
> suffix '+ds' to the imported version. If not please expand the
> information in the copyright file and talk to upstream to prevent the
> future usage of embedded code copies.
> 
> The same needs to be checked for the qt code that is also embedded in
> src/sysc/packages/qt/.

I have added the files in boost & qt to copyright

-- 
‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
 Digital design engineer
GPG KeyIDs: 4096R/A7EF5671 2048R/EDDDA1B7
GPG Fingerprints:
 6E2E E4BB 72E2 F417 D066  6ABF 7B30 B496 A7EF 5761
 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8  B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-electronics-devel/attachments/20180709/51504efb/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-electronics-devel mailing list