[Pkg-exim4-users] Re: Exim4 delivery question

[Wayne Topa]

>In /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template I added 
>smtp_accept_max_per_connection = 100 as per the exim docs but keep
>getting the error. No error message shows up when I run
>update-exim4.conf, but the 10 message limit persists.

Thanks to Bob for the pointer to the 'correct' way to solve this.
I had read that in the FAQ, yet somehow put in the 
'smtp_accept_max_per_connection' instead.  :-(

-----------


>As a side note, my ISP claims to support LOGIN, PLAIN and CRAM_MD5 logins:


>220 corpweb.trip.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.4/8.13.4; Thu, 19 May 2005 15:47:15 -0500 (CDT)
>EHLO

>501 5.0.0 EHLO requires domain address
>EHLO intergate.com
>250-corpweb.trip.net Hello host-69-95-14-38.roc.choiceone.net [69.95.14.38], pleased to meet you
>250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
>250-PIPELINING
>250-8BITMIME
>250-SIZE 40000000
>250-DSN
>250-ETRN
>250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5
>250-DELIVERBY
>250 HELP
>
>But if I have mutt configured with "set reply_to=ask-yes" and "set
> followup_to" I get this error:
>
>SMTP error from remote mailer after
>RCPT TO:<pkg-exim4-users-request@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
>host smtp.intergate.com [216.139.64.8]: 550 5.7.1 
> <pkg-exim4-users-request@lists.alioth.debian.org>... Relaying denied. 
>Proper authentication required.


Marc

  Here are the results of the debug

---  with cram_md5 + plain + login all enabled ----

2005-06-06 09:04:15 1DfHDv-00034s-D5 cram_md5 authenticator failed H=smtp.intergate.com [216.139.64.8] 535 5.7.0 authentication failed
2005-06-06 09:04:16 1DfHDv-00034s-D5 => pkg-exim4-users@lists.alioth.debian.org F=<huntbrittany@intergate.com> P=<huntbrittany@intergate.com> R=smarthost T=remote_smtp_smarthost S=314 H=smtp.intergate.com [216.139.64.8]:25 C="250 2.0.0 j56D6mja007303 Message accepted for delivery" QT=3m17s DT=3s
2005-06-06 09:04:16 1DfHDv-00034s-D5 Completed QT=3m17s


Maybe they did get my mail?  Cram_md5 still fails but the mail was accepted????

---------- Plain + Login enabled -------------------

2005-06-06 09:23:14 1DfHZS-0003zH-MI "wtopa@intergate.com" from env-from rewritten as "huntbrittany@intergate.com" by rule 2
2005-06-06 09:23:14 1DfHZS-0003zH-MI "wtopa@intergate.com" from from: rewritten as "huntbrittany@intergate.com" by rule 2
2005-06-06 09:23:14 1DfHZS-0003zH-MI <= huntbrittany@intergate.com U=wtopa P=local S=303 from <wtopa@intergate.com> for pkg-exim4-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
2005-06-06 09:23:22 1DfHZS-0003zH-MI => pkg-exim4-users@lists.alioth.debian.org F=<huntbrittany@intergate.com> P=<huntbrittany@intergate.com> R=smarthost T=remote_smtp_smarthost S=314 H=smtp.intergate.com [216.139.64.8]:25 C="250 2.0.0 j56DPsJK008513 Message accepted for delivery" QT=8s DT=7s
2005-06-06 09:23:22 1DfHZS-0003zH-MI Completed QT=8s


Other then the ISP being very inconsistant, the only thing I wonder about is the 
"wtopa@intergate.com".  Shouldn't that be wtopa@localhost or wtopa@buddy.mtntop.home
which is the local domain?  In the /etc/email-addresses it reads
wtopa:  huntbrittany@intergate.com

Sorry about the lack of your replies.  I forgot to add the list to my
.mailfilterrc.  I got your replies from the archives.  Thanks!!!

Wayne