[pymvpa] Alternatives to Cross-validation

[MS Al-Rawi]

Cross-validation is fine even in this case, you'll just need to rearrange your data in a way to leave-a-set-of-stimuli out, instead of leave-one-run-out. Perhaps PyMVPA has some functionality to do this. 

- Rawi




>________________________________
> From: Jacob Itzhacki <jitzhacki at gmail.com>
>To: pkg-exppsy-pymvpa at lists.alioth.debian.org 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:11 PM
>Subject: [pymvpa] Alternatives to Cross-validation
> 
>
>Dear all,
>
>
>First off thank you for your contribution. Great tool.
>
>
>Now that I am properly subscribed to the mailing list, I would like to ask:
>Is there is an alternative to cross-validation as I am hoping to use MVPA to train with one set of stimuli and test with a different one.
>I have been looking through the documentation but it is proving a difficult task as it is difficult to come up with an alternative keyword to search for.
>
>
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>
>J. Itzhacki
>_______________________________________________
>Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA mailing list
>Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA at lists.alioth.debian.org
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-exppsy-pymvpa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-exppsy-pymvpa/attachments/20121024/687b0c7b/attachment-0001.html>