[pymvpa] group-level analysis differences vs. pattern classification
Nick Oosterhof
nikolaas.oosterhof at unitn.it
Mon Sep 23 19:45:38 UTC 2013
On Sep 23, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Vadim Axel wrote:
> BTW, if at first step I run conjunction analysis with contrasts A > C and B >C; then, for ROIs resultant from conjunction analysis analysis, I run MVPA using the same data. Can I be accused by N.Kriegeskorte in double-dipping crime?
Not if your contrasts are independent of the classes that you want to classify.
We did such a conjunction analysis (with 'C' being baseline) followed by MVPA:
Oosterhof, N. N., tipper, S. P. & Downing, P. E. Viewpoint (in)dependence of action representations: an MVPA study. J Cogn Neurosci 24, 975–989 (2012).
More information about the Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA
mailing list