[pymvpa] Parallelization

marco tettamanti mrctttmnt at gmail.com
Fri Nov 10 08:57:04 UTC 2017


Dear Matteo and Nick,
thank you for your responses.
I take the occasion to ask some follow-up questions, because I am struggling to 
make pymvpa2 computations faster and more efficient.

I often find myself in the situation of giving up with a particular analysis, 
because it is going to take far more time that I can bear (weeks, months!). This 
happens particularly with searchlight permutation testing (gnbsearchlight is 
much faster, but does not support pprocess), and nested cross-validation.
As for the latter, for example, I recently wanted to run nested cross-validation 
in a sample of 18 patients and 18 controls (1 image x subject), training the 
classifiers to discriminate patients from controls in a leave-one-pair-out 
partitioning scheme. This yields 18*18=324 folds. For a small ROI of 36 voxels, 
cycling over approx 40 different classifiers takes about 2 hours for each fold 
on a decent PowerEdge T430 Dell server with 128GB RAM. This means approx. 27 
days for all 324 folds!
The same server is equipped with 32 CPUs. With full parallelization, the same 
analysis may be completed in less than one day. This is the reason of my 
interest and questions about parallelization.

Is there anything that you experts do in such situations to speed up or make the 
computation more efficient?

Thank you again and best wishes,
Marco


> On 10/11/2017 10:07, Nick Oosterhof wrote:
>
> There have been some plans / minor attempts for using parallelisation more
> parallel, but as far as I know we only support pprocces, and only for (1)
> searchlight; (2) surface-based voxel selection; and (3) hyperalignment. I
> do remember that parallelisation of other functions was challenging due to
> some getting the conditional attributes set right, but this is long time
> ago.
>
>> On 09/11/2017 18:35, Matteo Visconti di Oleggio Castello wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marco,
>> AFAIK, there is no support for parallelization at the level of
>> cross-validation. Usually for a small ROI (such a searchlight) and with
>> standard CV schemes, the process is quite fast, and the bottleneck is
>> really the number of searchlights to be computed (for which parallelization
>> exists).
>>
>> In my experience, we tend to parallelize at the level of individual
>> participants; for example we might set up a searchlight analysis with
>> however n_procs you can have, and then submit one such job for every
>> participant to a cluster (using either torque or condor).
>>
>> HTH,
>> Matteo
>>
>> On 09/11/2017 10:08, marco tettamanti wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> forgive me if this has already been asked in the past, but I was wondering
>>> whether there has been any development meanwhile.
>>>
>>> Are there any chances that one can generally apply parallel computing (multiple
>>> CPUs or clusters) with pymvpa2, in addition to what is already implemented for
>>> searchlight (pprocess)? That is, also for general cross-validation, nested
>>> cross-validation, permutation testing, RFE, etc.?
>>>
>>> Has anyone had succesful experience with parallelization schemes such as
>>> ipyparallel, condor or else?
>>>
>>> Thank you and best wishes!
>>> Marco
>>>
>




More information about the Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA mailing list