[Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-arkpandora: Re: Claiming the ownership as part of pkg-fonts

Vasudev Kamath kamathvasudev at gmail.com
Sat Aug 24 05:16:46 UTC 2013


On 10:21 Thu 22 Aug     , Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Fabian Greffrath (fabian at greffrath.com):
> > I agree packaging style is a personal choice. If you fixed the typo in
> > copyright and the installation of the fontconfig file, I'll be
> > satisfied. ;)
> I do not completely agree. Packaging style in team-maintained packages
> is no longer a personal choice.
> This is why the use of cdbs here makes me a bit uncomfortable.
> I would very much welcome having dh-based packaging as part of the
> team policy.

Is there documented in the team policy that only dh is the way to go? I
didn't find any so I used cdbs which I prefer over dh. Also font
packages are simple dh or cdbs doesn't  matter much CDBS also uses
debhelper (that is if you didn't notice) and both my packages have
normal .install .links file just like others.

Hope that makes you comfortable about my packages. 

Also both noto and arkpandora problems are fixed as per Fabian's

Vasudev Kamath
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20130824/946b32f9/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list