[Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-arkpandora: Re: Claiming the ownership as part of pkg-fonts

Fabian Greffrath fabian at greffrath.com
Mon Aug 26 07:13:56 UTC 2013

Am Samstag, den 24.08.2013, 10:46 +0530 schrieb Vasudev Kamath: 
> Is there documented in the team policy that only dh is the way to go? I
> didn't find any so I used cdbs which I prefer over dh. Also font
> packages are simple dh or cdbs doesn't  matter much CDBS also uses
> debhelper (that is if you didn't notice) and both my packages have
> normal .install .links file just like others.

I don't think everything need to be written down in policy. Having a
look at how all other packages in a team are maintained should already
give a clue. ;)

That said, with dh I would have been able to fix the fontconfig file
name issue myself in a matter of two lines (I do not like the current
fix which results in different file names in conf.avail and conf.d).
With CDBS, I didn't even have a clue where to start.



More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list