join++

Moritz Muehlenhoff jmm at inutil.org
Fri Jan 27 14:09:59 UTC 2006


Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > I'm a bit hesitant to move their maintainance to the group, because I
> > > suppose I need them for my application.  As long as there aren't any
> > > problems with their maintainance, I'll keep them to myself I think. :-)
> >
> > I've asked FD/DAM and they confirmed that team maintenance is suited as well
> > for NM as single maintenance. I agree with what Steve wrote and I'd
> > encourage you to move your packages to SVN to group maintenance.
> 
> Good, I'll do that then. :-)
> 
> I've just prepared a new upload for pioneers.  Should I put this list as
> maintainer (and myself as co-maintainer)?  I saw that's how it was done for
> komi, at least.

For freedoom is made it like this:

Maintainer: Debian Games Group <pkg-games-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
Uploaders: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm at debian.org>

This has the benefit that all bugs, installer mails etc. go to a common list.
Once more packages are in the archive and this becomes too noisy, we might move
the general discussion list to another mailing list.
 
> I am part of upstream for it, and the debian directory is in upstream cvs (but
> not in the distribution tarballs).  Because of this, I usually don't need to
> make any change outside debian/.  I guess I should only import debian/* into
> svn then, right?

See http://wiki.debian.org/Games/SVN
I'd suggest to leave out the tarball in this case:

 # Or alternatively, import only the files that are touched
 # by the .diff.gz
 svn-inject -o filename.dsc svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-games/packages

Cheers,
        Moritz



More information about the Pkg-games-devel mailing list