rott and grub-invaders packages under team maintainance

[Hans de Goede]

Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Hans de Goede schrieb:
>> I used the latest winrott, the version you point to is winrottGL, 
>> which is very much different (it uses openGL rendering), and was too 
>> different to easily backport any changes to the iculus.org rott Linux 
>> port.
> 
> Ah, allright. It seems I've mixed these two up.
> 
> However, I've had a closer look at your patchset yesterday and have 
> added the few missing parts to be compatible with the former Debian 
> patchset again. Everything compiles and seems to work fine. :)
> 
> Nevertheless, for my taste the patchset is still much too invasive, 
> given that it's mainly applied for the gain of a high resolution 
> renderer. Isn't it possible to port the renderer to the icculus port 
> without pulling in megabytes of winrott code?
> 

Thats what I've done, the high res renderer changes are a megabyte patch, they 
mostly change some constants to variables all over the place. The really lines 
changes size is less dramatic:

[hans at localhost devel]$ wc -l rott-1.0-winrott.patch
5511 rott-1.0-winrott.patch

[hans at localhost devel]$ diffstat rott-1.0-winrott.patch
  41 files changed, 2598 insertions(+), 533 deletions(-)

So it adds about 2k lines, which IMHO isn't so bad.

Regards,

Hans