interaction ecwolf vs game-data-packager

[Alexandre Detiste]

Le mardi 30 juin 2015, 14:04:45 Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
> I have no strong opinion on any approach, but generally prefer g-d-p
> generated packages to be engine-agnostic. 

That means having alternatives like for doom,heretic... ?

> Who knows, maybe some day wolf4sdl or the next best fork will get support for Blake Stone or S3NA.

This day is today :-)

https://github.com/bibendovsky/bstone

This is based on the Blake Stone source drop from 2013; it's just a matter of:

  git clone https://github.com/bibendovsky/bstone.git
  cmake .
  make
  ls -s ~/.steam/SteamApps/common/The\ Apogee\ Throwback\ Pack/Blake\ Stone/*.BS6
  ./bstone

nothing fancy & that support _all_ versions, and is SDL2-based.

---

ecwolf is still needed for S3NA support

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20150630/a4582a16/attachment.sig>