interaction ecwolf vs game-data-packager

[Fabian Greffrath]

Am Dienstag, den 30.06.2015, 19:11 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
> That means having alternatives like for doom,heretic... ?

Yes, I think so. I will have to add alternatives for /usr/games/wolf3d
to wolf4sdl and ecwolf and add Breaks against older versions of the
wolf4sdl package to the latter.

> > https://github.com/bibendovsky/bstone

I remember Braden recommended this port when we first talked about
Blake Stone support in ECWolf.

> nothing fancy & that support _all_ versions, and is SDL2-based.

This sounds good. Though, I am not sure if I really want to package and
maintain yet another source port...

> ecwolf is still needed for S3NA support

And it has some more advanced features that might be interesting for
mods.

 - Fabian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20150630/5d1c54f4/attachment.sig>