Need to upgrade performous, care if I do?

[Thorsten Glaser]

Hi Markus,

>I have no objections whatsoever. Every contribution that improves a
>package will always be greatly appreciated by me.

thanks. I’ll coordinate with Nik then (we’re drinking coffee
together at $dayjob all the time already anyway).

>> The debian/README.source shocked me a bit, and it turns out that
>> upstream split performous-tools off into a separate repository,
>> buildable stand-alone from the rest.
>
>It was a bit unfortunate how I had to create the upstream tarball. It
>was only necessary in the first place because I wanted to fix an RC bug

OK, I managed to do better now ☻

>would be much better, if we could just package upstream releases
>(tarballs) as usual. I guess this should be discussed with upstream as
>well because they rarely provide a new release and a lot of things have
>changed since the last stable version.

Yes, will do once we get things into a decent state. I’m hoping
for a feature to be implemented… will not hold my breath for it,
though… and found that it does not play well with my keyboard
layout (plus the licence, lintian, etc. fixes I already submitted).

>> Feedback, agreement, disagreement, anything?
>
>If this all leads to a better user experience and a better game, then
>I'm all for it.

Working on it ☻ I also already figured out they use MIDI note
numbers in the Ultrastar TXT files… I might do something with
bringing MuseScore and Performous together… but now, sleep.

(We’ll also need to ponder whether to add to the Uploaders
field or just occasionally contribute a team upload… I don’t
really have the time for even more software but…)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<cnuke> den AGP stecker anfeilen, damit er in den slot aufm 440BX board passt…
oder netzteile, an die man auch den monitor angeschlossen hat und die dann für
ein elektrisch aufgeladenes gehäuse gesorgt haben […] für lacher gut auf jeder
LAN party │ <nvb> damals, als der pizzateig noch auf dem monior "gegangen" ist