Bug#282281: kde: KDE applications take over Gnome file types
tmb@lumo.com, 282281@bugs.debian.org
tmb@lumo.com, 282281@bugs.debian.org
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:33:54 +0100
Thanks for looking into it. I still don't see why KDE adds
its applications to the list of Gnome mime types and handlers.
It seems to me there is some over-eager "merging" of the two
desktops going on. Either I want to run KDE or Gnome; running both
is confusing.
While you may want assign this to Gnome, it is a problem for KDE:
until it gets fixed, I can't install KDE on any machine where there
are Gnome users because it just gets too confusing.
Thomas.
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> reassign 282281 gnome
> severity 282281 wishlist
> retitle 282281 gnome: include a gnomish defaults.list for the mime types
> stop here
>
> * Tom [Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:46:39 +0100]:
>
>
>>Installing the KDE desktop packages after having installed the Gnome
>>desktop (and possibly running KDE once) causes KDE to take over lots
>>of mime types from Gnome even when running Gnome. For example, MP3's
>>are now played with noatun. Also, Nautilus keeps crashing when trying
>>to view folders with multimedia content, which may be due to Nautilus
>>trying to invoke KDE applications.
>
>
>>It seems to me that something is seriously broken with the KDE packaging
>>for Debian. Installing KDE packages or running the KDE desktop should
>>not make the Gnome desktop less usable.
>
>
> ok, I've been talking to the Gnome maintainers, and it seems that
> after gnome has made the list of available applications for some mime
> type, then it selects as default the first one in alphabetical order.
>
> I've been told that you can change the application to be used via:
> "right click on a mp3 in nautilus, properties, open with...".
>
> also, as it may make sense to have gnome to actually provide some list
> of defaults applications (I think KDE does this, giving priority by
> default to kde apps), I'm reassigning this bug to gnome (as agreed on
> IRC). you may write to 282281@bugs.debian.org and give your further
> opinios there.
>
> thanks to Sebastien Bacher for his assistance on IRC.
>