Bug#275949: gnome: The "wontfix" logic is alibistic and inconsistent
Josselin Mouette
joss at debian.org
Thu Sep 28 11:53:36 UTC 2006
Le jeudi 28 septembre 2006 à 11:08 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky a écrit :
> I see the arguments just alibistic, nothing more.
>
> 1, I don't have any problem to claim, that at least 90% of users do use
> mail client just for the purposes of mail client. For them, Thunderbird
> IS an equivalent for Evolution. Moreover, Evolution is just too heavy
> and complicated tool for them.
So what? 100% of gnome users don't use the complete set of applications
that we are providing by default. Should we remove them all for that
reason?
> 2, By exactly Your logic, Epiphany couldn't be even compared with
> Firefox. It contains some 5% of Firefox functionality, not taking into
> account the Firefox's add-on mechanism.
Bullshit.
> 3, In our enterprise, we want desktop to be as much consistent as
> possible. We need the same applications to be available both on Windows
> and Linux desktop. Therefore we do use Moziila Firefox and Mozilla
> Thunderbird; Nor epiphany of Evolution could do this.
And we want our desktop to be as consistent as possible, which means
shipping HIG-compliant applications.
> 4, <flame> Epiphany is just too ugly (call it "consistent" if U wish).
> I'd never offer it to our users. </flame>
If it's ugly, that must be because of your desktop theme. It's difficult
to make a more neutral look than epiphany's.
> 5, <rumors> Epiphany imposes web compatibility problems even in cases
> where Firefox dosen't have any problem. </rumors>
Bullshit.
> 6, Epiphany offers zero extension potential compared with Firefox. Not
> that I personally need Flash, however when needed, I want to have an
> option. Firefox is supported by these means.
Bullshit.
> 7, Solving problems with webpages. Firefox is well-known and many webs
> tend to be compatible with, I can use the stronger position. However, I
> could hardly argue with the "Epiphany". What is it? Can we eat it? Or is
> it related to some religion?
It uses the same engine - freed from a number of bugs by the xulrunner
maintainer.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette at ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss at debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list