Bug#275949: gnome: The "wontfix" logic is alibistic and inconsistent

[Mgr. Peter Tuharsky]

>> 4, <flame> Epiphany is just too ugly (call it "consistent" if U wish). 
>> I'd never offer it to our users. </flame>
> 
> If it's ugly, that must be because of your desktop theme. It's difficult
> to make a more neutral look than epiphany's.

Standard theme, untouched.

>> 5, <rumors> Epiphany imposes web compatibility problems even in cases 
>> where Firefox dosen't have any problem. </rumors>
> 
> Bullshit.

Mr. almighty, You've probably tested them all. Why don't You publish it?

> 
>> 7, Solving problems with webpages. Firefox is well-known and many webs 
>> tend to be compatible with, I can use the stronger position. However, I 
>> could hardly argue with the "Epiphany". What is it? Can we eat it? Or is 
>> it related to some religion?
> 
> It uses the same engine - freed from a number of bugs by the xulrunner
> maintainer.

Explain that to someone who is happy to know single more browser beside 
of IE.