Gnome plans for the lenny cycle

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>  Perhaps we need more intermediate milestones, which is something which
>  seems to be lacking in some areas (no goals for each milestone, no

I fully agree on this.

As a member of few teams in which no strong leadership is de facto
established (and this is generally good), I think all those teams will
benefit of knowing that they have to test-drive their next release
skills with some intermediate milestone; something like: ``X months
before the release you have to be ready on .. something ..''.

Given that the "X" and the "something" need to be internally defined by
the team I have no idea on how the RMs can enforce that, though.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20070420/6d19a1fd/attachment-0001.pgp