Fix lintian warning of clutter-0.9 in the NEW queue

[Li, Yan]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:05:02AM +0800, Li, Yan wrote:
> I think clutter-glx-1.0 is better. Libraries using other backends
> should be packaged to respective packages. Do you think we should
> package libraries work with other backends into this single package
> too?  Most program, like Anjal, needs clutter-glx only so depends on
> clutter-glx is quite simple and straightforward. Also shipping more
> shlibs in one package would make it take more space than necessary
> when running on devices with limited storage (such as netbooks, which
> clutter is designed for).

Good or not, I've attached my patch for changing package names to
libclutter-glx-*, for clutter-1.0.  If you decided to change name this
may save you some time.  :)

Thank you.

(sadly that svn diff can't represent file renamings, such as
libclutter-1.0-0.install to libclutter-glx-1.0-0.install).

-- 
Li, Yan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: deb-clutter-1.0-change-pkg-name.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20090731/c7e9dfbc/attachment.diff>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20090731/c7e9dfbc/attachment.pgp>