Fix lintian warning of clutter-0.9 in the NEW queue

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Li, Yan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:05:02AM +0800, Li, Yan wrote:
>> I think clutter-glx-1.0 is better. Libraries using other backends
>> should be packaged to respective packages. Do you think we should
>> package libraries work with other backends into this single package
>> too?  Most program, like Anjal, needs clutter-glx only so depends on
>> clutter-glx is quite simple and straightforward. Also shipping more
>> shlibs in one package would make it take more space than necessary
>> when running on devices with limited storage (such as netbooks, which
>> clutter is designed for).
> 
> Good or not, I've attached my patch for changing package names to
> libclutter-glx-*, for clutter-1.0.  If you decided to change name this
> may save you some time.  :)
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> (sadly that svn diff can't represent file renamings, such as
> libclutter-1.0-0.install to libclutter-glx-1.0-0.install).

Not sure this should be applied, but if so, it should be done before clutter
leaves NEW to avoid a transition.

Emilio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20090731/b23bf6bf/attachment.pgp>