Bug#530254: ekiga: Succesfully connected at sip-server side, but hang-up or status "failed" at my (client) side

Mishustin Alexey shumkar at shumkar.ru
Sat May 23 18:01:48 UTC 2009


В Сбт, 23/05/2009 в 19:38 +0200, Eugen Dedu пишет:
> Mishustin Alexey wrote:
> > В Сбт, 23/05/2009 в 21:12 +0400, Mishustin Alexey пишет:
> >>>>> I tried to backport Etch's 
> >>>>> version from Lenny sources, but with no success 
> >>>> Sorry, I meant 
> >>>>
> >>>> I tried to backport Etch's 
> >>>> version from sources to Lenny, but with no success
> >>> ekiga 3.2.4 I meant.
> >> Yes, that one worked good for me in Etch. It requires 
> >> Lenny's libpt 1.10.10 to be replaced with 1.10.0(1.10.2).

2.0.3 - that one worked good for me in Etch

> > Such dependency is not included directly in Build-dep
> > in /debian/control, but the compiler refuses to work, saying that the
> > PWlib version is not recommended one. May be, I understand something
> > wrong?
> 
> Ekiga 3.2.4 requires latest ptlib and opal, see 
> http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Download_Ekiga_sources
> 
> If you wish ekiga v3, either you upgrade to unstable/testing, or install 
> the non-official packages I sent.
> 
> For ekiga v2, looking at the output, I do not understand what happens. 
> Try removing all ekiga configuration (mv .gconf/apps/ekiga 
> /gconf/apps/ekiga-backup) and see if it works.

Aha, thank you.

> > Such dependency is not included directly in Build-dep
> > in /debian/control, but the compiler refuses to work, saying that the
> > PWlib version is not recommended one. May be, I understand something
> > wrong?
> 
> I do not understand, could you explain what versions are you talking about?

I haven't saved the output text and can not repeat the compiling
procedure now; as I remember, after checking build-dependencies the
compiler said something like this: "Sorry, PWlib version is not
recommended. Recommended one is ..<and number between Etch's and Lenny's
versions>". I considered, it wants Lenny's libpt to be replaced with
Etch's one. Wrong? I thought so because all build-dependencies were met
to that moment.

Regards,
Alex








More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list