About package gnome-system-tools again.

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 06/10/14 14:49, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
>      Hello!
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort has written on Monday,  6 October, at 13:45:
>> On 05/10/14 16:04, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
>
>>>       I wrote you on September 10th (also sent a copy to the bug #753701 as
>>> well) question if anyone is available or I should make a NMU instead. I
>>> again propose a NMU because gnome-system-tools affects usability of LXDE
>>> very much and therefore is required in many cases. The package with some
>>> fixed bugs and lintian problems (no other changes, as should be for NMU)
>>> is on my private server:
>
>>> http://www2.rep.kiev.ua/dnld/sid/gnome-system-tools_3.0.0-3.1.dsc
>
>>> Could any of you review it and upload it either as NMU or resign it with
>>> your credentials instead, I don't insist to have own name in it. And it's
>>> LowNMU package, you know. :)
>
>> gnome-system-tools, liboobs and system-tools-backends are unmaintained upstream
>> and no longer needed for GNOME. I was thinking in requesting removal from the
>> archive, but if you need them for LXDE, then I'd suggest you adopt them.
>
>      Well, I'm not against adopting them but in order to adopt them they
> should be orphaned or RFA declared first, right? They are neither O nor
> RFA ATM.

Not necessarily, given I'm explicitly giving you permission to adopt them. But 
if you really care about it, I can open RFA bugs for them.

Cheers,
Emilio