[pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: pkg-GNUstep-maintainers digest, Vol 1 #5 - 2 msgs

[Eric Heintzmann]

On 2004-04-25 15:19:08 +0200 G=C3=BCrkan Seng=C3=BCn <gurkan@linuks.mine=
.nu> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 06:32:09 -0600
> pkg-gnustep-maintainers-request@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>=20
>> Send pkg-GNUstep-maintainers mailing list submissions to
>> 	pkg-gnustep-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>=20
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> 	http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnustep-maintain=
ers
>>=20
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> 	pkg-gnustep-maintainers-request@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>=20
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> 	pkg-gnustep-maintainers-admin@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>=20
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of pkg-GNUstep-maintainers digest..."
>>=20
>>=20
>> Today's Topics:
>>=20
>>     1. Re: meta-gnustep packages (Eric Heintzmann)
>>     2. Re: meta-gnustep packages (Eric Heintzmann)
>>=20
>> --__--__--
>>=20
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:42:59 +0100
>>  From: Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st>
>> To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
>> Cc: pkg-gnustep-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: [pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] meta-gnustep packages
>>=20
>> 	Hi,
>>=20
>> On 2004-04-19 08:15:17 +0200 Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wr=
ote:
>>=20
>>> before introducingf such a mass of meta packages, I'd really like to=

>>> see something like a usable session file, which allows starting of
>>> gnustep using xdm/kdm/gdm.
>>=20
>> A simple call to debhelper in debian/rules should suffice:
>>=20
>> dh_installwm wm /usr/bin/gnustep-session
>>=20
>> where gnustep-session file would contain something like that :
>>=20
>> . /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh
>> /etc/init.d/gdomap start
>> openapp gdnc
>> /etc/init.d/gnustep_sndd start
>> openapp gpbs
>> wmaker
>>=20
>> But in wich package can we put this file ?
>> gnustep-back binary package ? no, because we should add a dependency =
to=20
>> wmaker.
>> a new gnustep-session package in gnustep-back source package ? Why no=
t ?
>> in the gnustep meta-package ? maybe but It would be best to keep=20
>> possibility to install the gnustep-session separatly.
>> A new gnustep-session source package ? okay for me.
>>=20
>> If anyone find a better name than gnustep-session...
> no soudns good to me. will you do the gnustep-session?
Yes I m currently working on it.

> i have updated meta-gnustep at www.linuks.mine.nu/i_debian/
> if it's ok i can upload it to experimental for some testing.

Another minor nits (sorry).
gnustep-base-examples contains only source code.
I think it's better to suggests it into gnustep-core-devel (or gnustep-d=
evel).
In gnustep-devel : maybe pantomime-dev would be useful for devlopment th=
an pantomime1.

	Eric