[Debian GNUstep maintainers] backbone package for debian

[Gürkan Sengün]

--Signature=_Sun__5_Dec_2004_14_38_43_+0100_khB6_L0yxUTUbFkQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> bad idea to rename package and source names at his point of time. the
> only thing you achieve is to delay the transition of all GNUstep
> related packages to testing and the release of those packages as part
> of sarge. what is so difficult to upload things first without renaming
> everything?

nothing, well preferences and terminal is maintained by evan. this was
really ment for etch+. i should have noted that.
currently we have gopen. and open can be there the next release.

i guess the latest time for the upload of terminal,preferences will be when
debian new queue items: pdfkit.framework (and the other gnustep stuff) of the upload date 2004-11-24 is processed. that'll also be the time for me to upload
meta-gnustep (waits for terminal,preferences) and lusernet (waits for pantomime), viewpdf (is waiting for pdfkit.framework). i guess this will fix
all the 
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnustep-gui
(hopefully before 17th december)

>bad idea ...
>http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=%2Fusr%2Fbin%2Fopen&searchmode=searchfiles&case=insensitive&version=unstable&arch=i386

about the open.tool and conflict with console-tools what do you suggest?
would dpkg-divert be the solution to this?

--Signature=_Sun__5_Dec_2004_14_38_43_+0100_khB6_L0yxUTUbFkQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBsw9lfI36WwmZVIsRAlwCAKC9HM3PG/wBr6XLzM/2sB2nPJ1gagCgz0Gp
tQsJ49qR1/XePJDGVgEgdH0=
=Nmbc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__5_Dec_2004_14_38_43_+0100_khB6_L0yxUTUbFkQ--