Bug#608504: please provide libgcrypt11 udeb package for debian-installer

Jonas Meurer jonas at freesources.org
Wed Jan 12 22:56:37 UTC 2011

Hey again,

On 03/01/2011 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2011-01-03 Jonas Meurer <jonas at freesources.org> wrote:
> > On 01/01/2011 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > > Uploaded with minor changes. I fear the package will need to go
> > > throug NEW tough, due to the added component (udeb).
> > Thanks for the quick response. But I fear that a binNMU will be required
> > once both libgcrypt11 1.4.6-2 and libgpg-error 1.10-0.2 entered debian
> > experimental.
> > I cannot prove this right now, as the libgcrypt11-udeb package is not
> > available yet, but from what I know since yesterday, libgcrypt11-udeb
> > might depend on libgpg-error0 instead of libgpg-error0-udeb,
> Hello,
> It does. I saw this just before uploading but uploaded anyway to get
> into NEW. I intend to version the build-depends accordingly, once the
> new gpg-error is accepted.

now that both libgcrypt11-udeb and libgpg-error0-udeb passed the NEW
queue, you could consider to re-upload libgcrypt11.

I'm not sure whether versioned build-depends help about that, though.
The versioned build-depends don't verify that the udeb is available,
after all. I thought about versioning the build-depends on
libgcrypt11-dev accordingly as well, but that could perfectly well be
achieved by installing the right version of that exact package
(libcrypt11-dev) locally, without having any repositories configured
that hold libgcrypt11-udeb.

i'd be interested in your opinion here. still unsure what to do about

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20110112/b5e47329/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-gnutls-maint mailing list