Bug#658739: status?

[Brian Kroth]

Andreas Metzler <ametzler at downhill.at.eu.org> 2013-01-09 19:17:
> On 2013-01-09 Brian Kroth <bpkroth at gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> May I ask what the proposed/potential solutions for this is then?
>> This is a major problem holding us up from serious wheezy
>> consideration where I work.
>
>> Please let me know if you'd like help testing something.
>
> Hello,
>
> sadly I have not got a plan. The Ubuntu change did not work out, it
> fixed one issue but opened others. The only obvious workaround is to
> use libnss-ldapd instead of libnss-ldap.
>
> cu andreas

Hi, unfortunately, as I outlined here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896
libnss-ldapd (or rather libpam-ldapd) is not an option for us, nor does 
it solve the problem (I've tested it).

Thanks,
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20130109/bdcd79ba/attachment.pgp>