Bug#658739: status?

[Brian Kroth]

Brian Paul Kroth <bpkroth at gmail.com> 2013-01-09 12:32:
> Andreas Metzler <ametzler at downhill.at.eu.org> 2013-01-09 19:17:
>> On 2013-01-09 Brian Kroth <bpkroth at gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> May I ask what the proposed/potential solutions for this is then?
>>> This is a major problem holding us up from serious wheezy
>>> consideration where I work.
>>
>>> Please let me know if you'd like help testing something.
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> sadly I have not got a plan. The Ubuntu change did not work out, it
>> fixed one issue but opened others. The only obvious workaround is to
>> use libnss-ldapd instead of libnss-ldap.
>>
>> cu andreas
>
> Hi, unfortunately, as I outlined here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896
> libnss-ldapd (or rather libpam-ldapd) is not an option for us, nor 
> does it solve the problem (I've tested it).
>
> Thanks,
> Brian

Sorry, that should have been here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658896#23

We use that pam_ldap config= trick for all sorts of things/services.

Thanks,
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20130109/3a1b7f38/attachment.pgp>