Bug#814954: libgcrypt20: add libgcrypt-mingw-w64-dev for cross-building to Windows targets

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On Sun 2016-02-21 05:12:49 -0800, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I have now merged/selectively pulled the necessary changes on the
> experimental branch. Builds-for-me. Could you take a look?

hm, nope, i'm actually seeing an error on the experimental branch with
the texlive compilation:

-----
[72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] Chapter 13 [79] [80] Chapter 14 [81]
[82] [83] Chapter 15 [84] Chapter 16 [85] [86]
/home/dkg/src/libgcrypt/libgcrypt20/doc/gcrypt.texi:5312: Could not find image 
file libgcrypt-modules for pdf.
@dopdfimage ...uld not find image file #1 for pdf}
                                                  @else @gdef @pdfimgext {JP...

@imagexxx ...t @fi @ifpdf @dopdfimage {#1}{#2}{#3}
                                                  @else @ifx @XeTeXrevision ...

@image ...true @fi @else @imagexxx #1,,,,, at finish 
                                                  @fi 
<argument> ...odules, 150mm,,Libgcrypt subsystems}
                                                  @unskip @hfil 
@centersub ...enalty @fi @line {@kern @leftskip #1
                                                  @kern @rightskip }
@\center ...{@hfil @ignorespaces #1 at unskip @hfil }
                                                  @let @centersub @relax 
l.5312 ...pt-modules, 150mm,,Libgcrypt subsystems}
                                                  

!pdfTeX error: pdfetex (file libgcrypt-modules.): cannot find image file
 ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
----

But i did just upgrade texlive on this build system to 2015.20160215-1,
so maybe that's at fault?  I'm pretty sure this isn't related to the
windows cross-build process.  Are you seeing the same thing with this
version of texlive-latex-base?

> What is still open is whether we need to ship the la files at all, and
> if we do whether they really should have non-empty dep-libs.

I think i don't need them for my purposes.  if you want to go ahead
without them, i'm happy to let you know (presumably via the BTS) if it
turns out that i do need em for whatever reason.

thanks for your prompt work on this, and your investigations!

       --dkg