Bug#969672: gnutls28: please upgrade to guile-3.0 soon, if feasible

Andreas Metzler ametzler at bebt.de
Thu Nov 26 07:05:36 GMT 2020


On 2020-11-25 Rob Browning <rlb at defaultvalue.org> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <ametzler at bebt.de> writes:

>> I think I have described how to reproduce this on amd64 in the other
>> bugreport:

>> (sid)ametzler at argenau:/$ rm -rf /tmp/GNUTLS/  /dev/shm/GNUTLS
>> (sid)ametzler at argenau:/$ mkdir /tmp/GNUTLS/  /dev/shm/GNUTLS
>> (sid)ametzler at argenau:/$ cd /dev/shm/GNUTLS
>> (sid)ametzler at argenau:/dev/shm/GNUTLS$ apt source gnutls28 ; ln -s /dev/shm/GNUTLS/gnutls28-3.6.15 /tmp/GNUTLS/ ; cd /tmp/GNUTLS/gnutls28-3.6.15
>> (sid)ametzler at argenau:/tmp/GNUTLS/gnutls28-3.6.15$ dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -j1 -B

> Does it happen if you build in a more typical filesystem?

It is the simplest setup I found.

> It just built
> fine on amdahl (arm64 porterbox), with a current sid chroot, and the -5
> package from experimental, via "fakeroot debian/rules binary".

> I can't do what you describe above there because /dev/shm is 64M in the
> porterbox chroots.

Doesn't your own local development machine have a bigger tmpfs?
Abovementioned reproducer works on amd64.

cu Andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



More information about the Pkg-gnutls-maint mailing list