[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#541836: Suggests wrong -doc package

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 17:07 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Em Dom, 2009-08-16 às 17:52 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> (...)
> > there are some variations on the -doc package name in Debian, and
> > changing it is probably not viable at the moment (going through NEW and
> > all).
> 
> Is this still your opinion?  I think it'd be better to have a standard
> format of package names than to change haskell-devscripts, even if doing
> this would take some time.

It’s still my opinion, but I’m not passionate about it: If someone else
thinks its worth going for, and will do the work (including possible
discussions with ftp-master or so), I’ll happily do the uploading.

BTW, which name is better? libghc6-*-doc or haskell-doc? Boths have its
merits?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-haskell-maintainers/attachments/20091018/5ecf1ca2/attachment.pgp>