Bug#426141: classpath .95 (or .96) packaged for arm?

[Dalibor Topic]

Bob Black wrote:
> Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically
> armel only going forward?
>
>   
It's packaged for arm, but it doesn't build:

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=classpath;ver=2%3A0.96.1-1;arch=arm;stamp=1200397843

classpath depends on ecj, which depends on gcj, which in turn depends on 
ecj to build, and since there is
no gcj-4.2 build for arm, the circularity at the end of the chain is 
killing the builds.

One way to unblock it would be to make ecj depend on jamvm alternatively 
on arm, I guess.

cheers,
dalibor topic