Bug#426141: classpath .95 (or .96) packaged for arm?

[Bob Black]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:14:38AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Bob Black wrote:
>> Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically
>> armel only going forward?
>>
>>   
> It's packaged for arm, but it doesn't build:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=classpath;ver=2%3A0.96.1-1;arch=arm;stamp=1200397843

Ah, ok.

> classpath depends on ecj, which depends on gcj, which in turn depends on 
> ecj to build, and since there is no gcj-4.2 build for arm, the circularity
> at the end of the chain is killing the builds.

I clicked around packages.debian.org looking at the various deps and 
it seemed there were (up to date) arm builds for the ones i looked at.

Looking at gcj-4.2's pool dir (sorted by date):
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/?C=M;O=A

I see various* _arm.deb files dated Jan 18

That's a couple days after the date on the buildd log from above.

Any chance the build just needs to be retried?

> One way to unblock it would be to make ecj depend on jamvm alternatively on 
> arm, I guess.

:)

Bob